keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
The fully doxxed have more skin in the game than the pseuds, which is why it’s perplexing to me how in many instances pseuds are more easily able to accrue trust A pseud’s opinion should be doubly discounted. They have no reputation risk
25 replies
7 recasts
99 reactions

agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
in the market of ideas reputation is earned by being interesting or right consistently many scammers use the -i’m doxxed excuse to lure you in and divert from their scamming, A pseudonym doesnt necessarily mean much i use my real name for example, i just dont think im famous enough for that to matter to anyone online
4 replies
0 recast
17 reactions

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
I can’t dump my name and get a new one the same way you can with a pseud If Proxy was doxxed he wouldn’t have been able to rinse and repeat Yes all people are bad and deserving suspicion docxed and not doxxed alike But to me the burden of proof should be higher with a pseud, if that makes sense
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

studio whimsi pfp
studio whimsi
@whimsi.eth
>if proxy was doxxed betashop seems to be doing alright with the rinse and repeating
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Big diff between trying and failing and literal outright theft tho
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
true, sadly scam and rug have lost any meaning aftwr years of abuse and mixed meanings
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

agrimony↑🎩 pfp
agrimony↑🎩
@agrimony.eth
Yeah, maybe unpopular opinion but imo there's a reason why non accredited investors are not allowed into certain high risk markets
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
my opinion is that’s bs to keep their moat (classic only rich people get richer) madoff scammed many famous intelligent well equipped and informed people that were “accredited investors”
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions