The fully doxxed have more skin in the game than the pseuds, which is why it’s perplexing to me how in many instances pseuds are more easily able to accrue trust 

A pseud’s opinion should be doubly discounted. They have no reputation risk

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

in the market of ideas reputation is earned by being interesting or right consistently

many scammers use the -i’m doxxed excuse to lure you in and divert from their scamming, A pseudonym doesnt necessarily mean much

i use my real name for example, i just dont think im famous enough for that to matter to anyone online

I can’t dump my name and get a new one the same way you can with a pseud 

If Proxy was doxxed he wouldn’t have been able to rinse and repeat 

Yes all people are bad and deserving suspicion docxed and not doxxed alike 

But to me the burden of proof should be higher with a pseud, if that makes sense

>if proxy was doxxed

betashop seems to be doing alright with the rinse and repeating

imagining a world where ai reunites humanity
⟢ /whimsio coded

Big diff between trying and failing and literal outright theft tho

ex-/airswap. part time node runner, full time shitcaster, all time higher

my opinion is that’s bs to keep their moat (classic only rich people get richer)

madoff scammed many famous intelligent well equipped and informed people that were “accredited investors”

Yeah, maybe unpopular opinion but imo there's a reason why non accredited investors are not allowed into certain high risk markets

true, sadly scam and rug have lost any meaning aftwr years of abuse and mixed meanings