Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/law-policy
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Adam Snyder pfp
Adam Snyder
@adamsnyder.eth
On March 20, reports surfaced that the SEC is investigating the EF One week later, the EF proposed changing Ethereum’s issuance curve and is loudly shouted down by the community Seems like pretty compelling evidence that the EF doesn’t control the protocol. Coincidence or strategic lawyering? I think the latter
2 replies
1 recast
8 reactions

Snibb123.eth pfp
Snibb123.eth
@snibb123
This is an interesting perspective. What, if anything, would make this falsifiable.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Adam Snyder pfp
Adam Snyder
@adamsnyder.eth
Imo, this would be falsifiable if: (i) researchers didn't expect the public outcry (unlikely) (ii) the timeframe for releasing the proposal was established pre-subpoena (fairly likely) (iii) researchers never discussed with counsel (???) tbh I'm really looking for a silver lining in a rough time for us ETH stans 😅
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

ciefa 🐌 eth/acc pfp
ciefa 🐌 eth/acc
@ciefa.eth
They have been working on the paper and research for over 6 months. https://twitter.com/adietrichs/status/1775554454923747758
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Snibb123.eth pfp
Snibb123.eth
@snibb123
No that makes sense. I actually think there’s another reason for the SEC’s subpoena that has nothing to do with the EF. According to Laura Shin’s podcast, they’re looking for info ammo in the ETH ETF lawsuits, not to actually go after the EF. In that case, they’d not be looking to classify ETH as a security.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction