Danica Swanson pfp
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
The short half-life of casts is one of my biggest frustrations here too. Plenty of evergreen material just gets quickly buried and overlooked. As long as every cast is just more grist for the algo content mill, and we have few affordances for resurfacing hidden gems and preserving context over longer time frames, this will feel like an uphill battle for people who care about good conversation. cc @kenny
3 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

Adam pfp
Adam
@adam-
🎯 In addition to it being buried, there's just no way to keep up on it all. It needs curation to be surfaced properly. I've been using @askgina.eth to help surface stories and happenings I might have missed, but what really needs to happen is a bot you can set to a specific interval where it scans specific channels and feeds and emails you/ casts the highlights, along with links links so you can dive in further.
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Danica Swanson pfp
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
It definitely needs curation. I like the customizable flashback bot idea, though human curation is also important. I recently tried making a custom curated feed for /slowcore-hq using Cura. Having a tool that allows mods to curate their own feed is a step in the right direction. But who knows how many people will even see that curated feed at all, let alone interact with anything in it? I wrote about my approach to "catching up" in this cast, and also mentioned our plans to launch a new channel with some built-in social "rails" to encourage ongoing convos. Looking forward to experimenting with it. https://farcaster.xyz/danicaswanson/0xbf7addef
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Adam pfp
Adam
@adam-
I'm a big believer that the inbox is still the best way to get retention for long form and deep ideas. When things are made for the timeline, they're competing against a lot of other ideas along with noise. When people opt in via a newsletter they have less of those temptations and are more likely to make it through. The timeline and the inbox have to work in tandem, but latter still has an attention advantage.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Danica Swanson pfp
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
I'm returning to this thread the next day, in a way I'd do much more often if it were easier to preserve context and have ongoing convos over longer time frames on the purple app. :) When I read your comment yesterday, my first thought in response was: "well, email is full of noise too..." But I was also trying to recall a blog post I read recently that agreed with your take and had some interesting things to say about the zeitgeist on the internet from where he sits. I wanted to dig it up and re-read it before responding. Here it is with some quotes: "If you want to be an individual who writes stuff on a website who talks to other individuals about it, email, a webpage, and RSS do really well for that. You might not need more than that." [...] "Here’s what stuck out to me about the *context* in which these posts are being discussed: - These posts are all in conversation, almost all of them from the last few weeks, on static, self-made websites, and most of the authors insist on email as the main channel of response. - People are having substantive conversations about a topic that matters to them, and being pretty articulate, nuanced, and respectful about it even when they’re disagreeing. - The posts have reached people outside of the author’s immediate community without the authors promoting them on any platforms." The post is worth reading in full, but to your point: I'm going to keep noodling on possible ways to use email to help stoke the long-form discussion on the purple app. https://www.mmmx.cloud/after-xoxo
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction