KMac pfp
KMac
@kmacb.eth
Trusts are weird. I get it for inheritance when the kids are minors but it’s weird that I can divorce-proof my kids long after I’m gone. Smart contracts are helping me get over this but the idea that the dead can dictate the future for the living is kinda mind bending & intuitively feels dumb or arrogant outside the smart contracts context.
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

accountless.eth pfp
accountless.eth
@accountless.eth
devil's advocate: smart contracts don't really help b/c by the tiem you are dead, most likely those servers, software, networks won't be around. so, the security is psychological beyond some point. storage of the decision tho / a proof of it, offchain, may end up being the better way.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

accountless.eth pfp
accountless.eth
@accountless.eth
examples: - issuer: you have an annuity. the name of the original issuer has changed as they have been acquired etc over the years. - account: you have an annuity w/ scheduled deposits. let's say annuity doles out some money at kid is 18, 35, 50, and 65. at age 18, kid is using for email name @ college . edu and college credit union for bank. at 35, using different email and account, and if married using joint accounts. and so on... - network: swift newtork may not even be operable wen kid is 65 - software: cobol? let's hope not - ...
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions