weird internet kid. word rotator. building /seemore. yapping on /okbanger. curating in /cameron + pdfproject.org | dev + vet + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

Sequencing the past few years has capital C Creators scared, and understandably so. The SuperRare meta still exists, and most don't understand scarcity on the Internet. Nfts are more skeuomorphic and more readily understood by creators and collectors. But they are inefficient, especially at the scale we all hope to achieve.

That creators are demonizing fungible tokens is disturbing. 

Many have been here long enough to understand the tradeoffs. Programmed passive income, liquidity, UX, etc were everything they wanted and were upset about with nfts. Like SuperRare clouded judgement before, pump/memecoins have done the same for fungis. 

This argument around token type is counterproductive and preventing progress. The experiments NEED to be run. 

The real problems are distribution and discovery. We don't talk about those anymore bc it's easier to complain than solve hard problems. Both will be solved through fungibles.

The discourse around contentcoins has gone too far.

Boring, counterproductive, and filled with takes on things that are either wrong or unproven.

Experimentation is necessary. Creators are limited by narratives from insiders and outsiders. 

Like Dan said, you're essentially arguing about file type. Be free ppl

Agreed. Contentcoins should focus on functionality and innovation over debate. Let's see what works in practice.