Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Monteluna pfp
Monteluna
@monteluna
Going through the Berachain POL v1.1 proposal. A short and sweet on first glance: 1. Cut BGT emissions as a whole. 2. Redirect some of the cuts into subsidizing major BERA pairs to drive removing BERA from the market and locking into LP (BERA-HONEY, BERA-wBTC, etc). 3. BGT boost incentives should only be in BERA, and take a cut of these incentives to be owned directly by the chain as Chain Owned Liquidity. It's like if the Ethereum Foundation took a page out of OlympusDAO and market made it's own DEX with an enshrined on-chain Aerodrome using the chain's native token. Do not be distracted by the Berabaddies anon. There's some good stuff on chain here. https://forum.berachain.com/t/pol-v1-1-bera-in-control/107
3 replies
1 recast
3 reactions

Carl Gustaf 👨🏼‍💻 pfp
Carl Gustaf 👨🏼‍💻
@0xbob
A very welcome change. I’m happy to see that they understood the current situation need to be changed and making changes with $BERA capture 🤩
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Monteluna pfp
Monteluna
@monteluna
Idk I'm skeptical. One of the things I constantly get into with people is a lot of these mechanism designs don't really have any correlation to fees or profits. Sometimes the only answer is macro tailwinds. It does make more sense to route boost incentives to be BERA exclusive, but you can't tell me the recent and future price movements will have anything to do with that.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction