Hyperliquid
The blockchain to house all finance. Trade, build apps, and launch tokens on the same hyper-performant chain. X by @HyperFND
HyperLiquid vs Aster - The White Whaleās Take
A lot of you have asked, so I spent a couple hours digging into Aster and even placed a test trade.
Thereās no denying Asterās rapid growth - articles everywhere, surging new users, token price action, and yesā¦front-end hiccups under traffic (I couldnāt see my balance or withdraw funds).
But the real question: did someone just roll out a HyperLiquid killer?
In testing Aster, I realized something about myself: I went into the test wanting it to be better than HL. I love HyperLiquid and owe it for life-changing gains - but that desire for ābetterā shows even the best protocol leaves you hungry for more. That likely says more about me as an end-user than it does about HL itself.
I'll also say this research took more time than it should have, because the answers I was looking for were not overly transparent with Aster. Which was warning sign #1.
Hereās the breakdown:
Liquidity quality (the big one)
HyperLiquid: Depth is native to the venue - on-chain CLOB on a custom L1 that attracts real trading activity. Liquidity is structural, not sponsored.
Aster: Deep (right now) thanks to ultra-low fees + MM programs. Hidden Order feature is cool. But itās off-chain matched and curated. Great UX, fragile foundation.
Decentralization & censorship resistance
HyperLiquid: Orders, cancels, fills - on-chain. No black-box sequencer, no choke point. Even if the front-end dies, the chain runs.
Aster: Non-custodial settlement is solid but still rely on a centralized matcher. Chokepoint remains.
Price integrity & fairness
HyperLiquid: Composite mark/oracle + transparent book = fewer scam wicks, fairer liquidations.
Aster: Pyth marks + Hidden Orders boost execution, but transparency is limited to what they show you.
Performance at scale
HyperLiquid: Sub-second finality on-chain. HFT-grade without sacrificing trustlessness.
Aster: Feels fast and cheap because it is - off-chain matching + sexy UX. Just not trustless (yet).
Durability of the edge
HyperLiquid: Moat is architectural. Neutral, on-chain, self-custodial. Hard to rug, fake, or regulate away.
Aster: Innovating hard, branching into stocks/FX, and polished UX. If they decentralize matching, itās a true category fight.
Bottom line:
If you want deep, durable, credibly NEUTRAL liquidity - the kind that holds the test of time - HyperLiquid wins.
Aster deserves credit for speed, and features, but its liquidity engine is still operator-dependent.
HyperLiquidās liquidity is structural and radically transparent.
And as with everything in crypto, the number one thing that matters is liquidity. I think I'm going to stick with the truest "DEX" of the two that's fully on-chain. Because where market-makers are allowed to play in the shadows the trader rarely wins.
š«” From the depths ā
The White Whale š
https://x.com/TheWhiteWhaleHL/status/1968710257678434411 0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
