Goverland
gl.app - change the dao game!
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
Let’s bring back “New DAOs Wednesday”! @defiapp launched its DAO in June and already counts over 2.6K voters. It's building a mobile Web3 hub: Swap, Earn, Leverage, Lend in one place, gasless and cross-chain. The experience is designed to stay simple, with wallet abstraction removing the need for seed phrases or complex bridges. Governance kicked off just a month ago, with four proposals already passed. Feels like the right time to check in and either watch or participate from the very start. $HOME holders can vote on: • Protocol changes • Treasury actions • Integrations Voting power is calculated as: 4 × staked $HOME + liquid $HOME held on Base and BNB You can vote directly in gl.app. Search “DeFi App” to see their space, follow proposals, track voter activity, and explore how power shifts over time.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
Tracking the Uniswap Fee Switch: A Case Study A single governance proposal can move markets. We used gl.app to track the $UNI 'fee switch' story, a proposal to share trading fees with token holders. Here's a breakdown: Catalyst and Reversal. On the gl.app price chart, you can see exactly when the 'Activate Uniswap Protocol Governance' proposal went to a community poll on Snapshot. It passed with strong support, following a +60% price jump that started when the discussion first appeared on the forum in February. However, the team postponed the final onchain vote to double-check a technical issue, and the price returned to its starting level in May. Anticipatory Market Behavior. Now, more than a year later, the fee switch is back on the table. The Uniswap Foundation has started a 'Foundation Feedback Group' to get community feedback before a new vote. While no proposal is live yet, it's a key step forward. The '1 Month' chart on gl.app shows a price uptrend during this same period. An interesting observation for those tracking the influence of governance on price. Conclusion: From Reactive to Proactive Analysis. So what's the takeaway? Don't just analyze what happened. Get ready for what's next. The smartest play is setting a notification for new Uniswap proposals in gl.app. It's how you get an alert the second a rumor becomes a real deal.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
korv 🎩 pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
gl.app pfp
Watching the DAO. Block 8 Voters also participate in... This view shows where DAO voters also cast votes outside their home base. It reveals how participation moves across projects and where governance activity connects. High overlap can point to shared delegation, coordinated voting, or habits formed by active voters across ecosystems. Low overlap highlights DAOs with local-only participation and fewer external ties. Let’s look at two DAOs. - Alpaca Network has 15 total voters. 80% of them didn’t vote in any other DAO. Most participation is internal, with very limited links outward. This kind of profile may suggest an isolated voter base, or one that's just starting out, shaped mostly by native token holders or internal core contributors. - Gnosis DAO, by contrast, has a much broader reach. Only 13% of its voters are exclusive. A large share also participates in Stargate, CoW DAO, Aave, and others. This pattern points to shared governance infrastructure, active delegates, or users who move between ecosystems with clear voting intent. Voter overlap helps identify how DAOs build their participation layer. Localized voting stays within close groups. Broader overlap points to shared governance routines and connections across ecosystems. Watching the DAO continues 🍀 Download gl.app to explore more voting patterns
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction