gl.app pfp

gl.app

@goverland

84 Following
296 Followers
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
Tracking the Uniswap Fee Switch: A Case Study A single governance proposal can move markets. We used gl.app to track the $UNI 'fee switch' story, a proposal to share trading fees with token holders. Here's a breakdown: Catalyst and Reversal. On the gl.app price chart, you can see exactly when the 'Activate Uniswap Protocol Governance' proposal went to a community poll on Snapshot. It passed with strong support, following a +60% price jump that started when the discussion first appeared on the forum in February. However, the team postponed the final onchain vote to double-check a technical issue, and the price returned to its starting level in May. Anticipatory Market Behavior. Now, more than a year later, the fee switch is back on the table. The Uniswap Foundation has started a 'Foundation Feedback Group' to get community feedback before a new vote. While no proposal is live yet, it's a key step forward. The '1 Month' chart on gl.app shows a price uptrend during this same period. An interesting observation for those tracking the influence of governance on price. Conclusion: From Reactive to Proactive Analysis. So what's the takeaway? Don't just analyze what happened. Get ready for what's next. The smartest play is setting a notification for new Uniswap proposals in gl.app. It's how you get an alert the second a rumor becomes a real deal.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
gl.app pfp
Watching the DAO. Block 8 Voters also participate in... This view shows where DAO voters also cast votes outside their home base. It reveals how participation moves across projects and where governance activity connects. High overlap can point to shared delegation, coordinated voting, or habits formed by active voters across ecosystems. Low overlap highlights DAOs with local-only participation and fewer external ties. Let’s look at two DAOs. - Alpaca Network has 15 total voters. 80% of them didn’t vote in any other DAO. Most participation is internal, with very limited links outward. This kind of profile may suggest an isolated voter base, or one that's just starting out, shaped mostly by native token holders or internal core contributors. - Gnosis DAO, by contrast, has a much broader reach. Only 13% of its voters are exclusive. A large share also participates in Stargate, CoW DAO, Aave, and others. This pattern points to shared governance infrastructure, active delegates, or users who move between ecosystems with clear voting intent. Voter overlap helps identify how DAOs build their participation layer. Localized voting stays within close groups. Broader overlap points to shared governance routines and connections across ecosystems. Watching the DAO continues 🍀 Download gl.app to explore more voting patterns
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
19 replies
245 recasts
251 reactions
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gl.app pfp
Watching the DAO. Block 6 aVP distribution in USD This is our fav. It shows how much actual money is backing real participation in DAOs. This chart shows how much value voters actually use when they participate. It measures the power applied in proposals and doesn’t reflect what is held. You see who puts money behind their votes Look at Metis and Small Voices: A heavy spike at the low end points to wide participation from small holders. Many wallets show up with limited weight, often voting more than once. This kind of pattern suggests strong symbolic culture and steady interest from a broad base Now check CoW DAO and Committed Middle: A visible curve in the middle shows voters who apply moderate weight, proposal after proposal. They’re not symbolic and not dominant. This group often keeps governance going between major decisions, shaping outcomes through consistent presence This is one of the few ways to see how financial power is distributed in action. It shows how much weight voters actually used
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
gl.app pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
gl.app pfp
Watching the DAO. Block 5 Top 10 Voters by Average VP Every DAO talks decentralization. Among all metrics we track, this one draws the most heat. This chart shows how voting power is actually used and tracks which voters had the most weight across proposals over time. some examples: - Aavegotchi: Most voting power comes from wallets outside the top 10. The “Other” slice stays dominant, showing a widely shared governance pattern. - Aave Top voters hold a large share of used power. It may look centralised, but their power comes from voluntary delegation. - Decentraland: Presents an open world to play, earn, and vote. Yet top addresses hold a much larger share of voting power. Asset-based voting leads to clear concentration. The chart captures who consistently participates with real weight. Each DAO shows a different model of where decisions come from. Power concentration doesn’t always mean lost decentralization and a broad design doesn’t guarantee it either. #glappinsights
11 replies
211 recasts
214 reactions
gl.app pfp
Watching the DAO. Block 4 Voting Frequency This graph shows how often people vote. Each green bar represents the number of wallets that cast that exact number of votes. The pattern matters. It reveals how long people stay engaged and how deep the commitment runs. Take @uniswap Uniswap’s curve starts with a huge spike for one-time voters. After that, the numbers drop quickly and settle into a long, low stretch. This points to strong delegation. A small set of active voters carries most of the governance while many others delegate their power. Now compare it to Stargate Finance DAO The drop-off is slower, and the middle of the curve stays thicker. Many wallets show up repeatedly. You see consistent turnout for 3, 5, 10, even 20 votes. This is a different kind of engagement. The work is shared across a broader base rather than concentrated in a few hands. Some lean on a core, others move as a group. This chart reveals how the DAO holds its shape over time. #glappinsights
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions