Weekly DAO call will be on holiday until after the new year!

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

organizations are value funnels

0 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

See ya'lls soon!

1 reply

1 recast

3 reactions

Last week we talked about closed loop governance and building for accessibility. Join us this week and bring your own topic! Special guest @jango.eth will share with us about @revnet and how it works to tokenize revenue streams. https://x.com/i/spaces/1dRJZagNOPXGB

0 reply

1 recast

3 reactions

Could farcaster rebuild DAOs ?

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Coming soon to a space near you! https://x.com/i/spaces/1DXGyWXRydWxM

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

came across this fascinating exploration of "auto"(https://auto.antikythra.org) and it made me re-rethink what the "A" in DAO actually stands for. Section 1.5 offers a brilliant provocation: "A truly autonomous car would be one where you request it to take you to work and it decides to go to the beach instead."

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

We're going live today with a pre 🇺🇸🦃 celebration with an exploration of game theory prompted by @svenh Catch it live in 30 min: https://x.com/i/spaces/1yNGabmdyOgJj

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

Absolutely bonkers deployment https://x.com/z0r0zzz/status/1992516694607073500?s=46

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Let's Talk About DAOs is LIVE TODAY - join us! Last week we explored deep questions: Why do projects with best intentions keep degrading into the same toxic playbook? Every early choice sets your foundation. Once on the incumbent system's rails, you end up in the same place: meme token or meme token with extra steps. @kyngkai909 reframed DAOs: "What if we looked at DAOs as conflict resolution systems?" Focus on dispute resolution first, coordination follows. When there's no conflict, you hardly need DAO tech. Make conflict resolution priority #1, not #25. We explored conflict avoidance vs. resolution. Instead of recognizing tension that needs balance, we pick a side. That doesn't resolve conflict - it excludes everyone who disagrees. @thethriller on tensegrity: tension that maintains system integrity. Build flexible systems that adapt. This week: More questions, deeper thinking. Join: https://x.com/i/spaces/1YpJkknzNvyJj?s=20

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Paradigm shift from @kyngkai909 on last week's call: "We look at DAOs as governance solutions. But what if we just looked at DAOs as conflict resolution systems?" Early DAO tooling showed this - DAOs as dispute resolution mechanisms. That's what they really are: handling disputes between various groups of people. "Focus on them as conflict and dispute resolution systems - they allow for simpler and freer coordination." @thethriller added a @durgadas.eth reference: "DAOs often design for conflict resolution as the 25th priority when it's the core thing you're designing for. When there's no conflict, you hardly need the DAO technology system." This changes everything. Design for conflict resolution first, and governance flows from that. It's about handling tension between conflicting priorities in democratic systems. Recording: https://x.com/i/spaces/1jMJgRYQXnYGL?s=20 Next call: https://x.com/i/spaces/1YpJkknzNvyJj?s=20

0 reply

1 recast

3 reactions

Last week we tackled a frustrating reality: despite best intentions from founders, things keep degrading into the same toxic playbook. @bpetes.eth shared years of ruminating on this insight: every choice you make early on sets the foundation you build downstream. Once on the incumbent system's rails, they keep nudging you down the track. You end up in the same place: meme token or meme token with extra steps. Why? Traditional VCs like the playbook as-is. They've established standards with them as intermediary between founders and building ideas. Finding partners who won't force you down the same pathway while building something new - that's the challenge. We explored building in the open rather than in a vacuum. Cataloging choices that lead somewhere different. Walking this journey together instead of each founder hitting the same walls alone. Recording: https://x.com/i/spaces/1jMJgRYQXnYGL?s=20 Next call: https://x.com/i/spaces/1YpJkknzNvyJj?s=20

1 reply

2 recasts

5 reactions

We're back after our X-rug last week! x.com/i/spaces/1jM... I'm bringing up an idea to share in the call about changing up the format a little and introducing a video-call element and cross-streaming to increase our accessibility and reach!

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

https://blog.hatsprotocol.xyz/making-daos-work?referrer=0xBC5b552641e5d203f0a6C230aA9dC14DA7450053&frame=true

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

@clanker makes app coins frictionless as forking code. Pre-sales, custom vaults, flexible fees. The infrastructure for communities to govern. No permission, just deployment. You can spin up coordination primitives faster than lawyers can draft incorporation docs. DAOs stop being a dream and become inevitable. Every app is a tradeable governance surface. The networks already live in the spaces between institutions. Code gives us substrates for micro-sovereignties.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction