zakhap.eth

@zakhap.eth

315 Following

321 Followers

zakhap.eth pfp

How do you mean? It’s supposed to sorta function like the new Zora token model but for a collective/dao token on Clanker?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

Turns out models are really good at simulating… reality, language, code, situations, etc. as we accept language as the shadow of a reality (our whole education is predicated on building a history and model of the word in our mind in language), the simulation/facsimile/projections produced becomes our world model. [indiana jones idol swapping companionship with a projection of companionship meme format]

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

I will keep y'all posted on my experiments

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

zakhap.eth pfp

brilliant wow thank you so much for the thorough response.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

4. Last question: I assume it would be annoying to have to directly buy the dao token for each new launch, so some sort of router contract would be necessary. I see you can buy directly with ETH even if the paired token is WETH, so I assume it's hitting the WETH gateway? sorry I'm a bit of newb on this token routing stuff

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

2. The pool configuration is roughly this, yeah? - Starting Tick: -230400 (~$27,000 market cap equivalent) - Default Supply: 100 billion tokens - Paired Token: WETH (default) - Tick Spacing: 200

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

3. Is there a way to specify a different Paired Token? The "goal" is for a new clanker token to be a "dao" token (sorta like $anon) that enables holders to launch new clankers "as the collective/dao" and denominate their new tokens in their dao token (creating buy pressure on the dao token). I've figured out the dao part, but I'm not so sure on the Paired token part?

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

ok @dish I've got some ideas I'd like to build on top of clanker. Some questions I have: 1. if I interact directly with the factory contract, is there any reason that custom uniV4 hooks wouldn't work? I know in the SDK you've hardcoded the clanker static/dynamic fee hooks as the only options there.

2 replies

0 recast

3 reactions

zakhap.eth pfp

Follow your heart and build the mega super mini app

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

@july I recently read your blog post on Sarastro's Aria which was dope. Was excited to find another head on here

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

The conductor Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau does an incredible job really pulling the most out of orchestra. One of the best recordings of all time IMO.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

Wagner is known for delayed resolutions in his works, slowly edging the audience toward harmonic satisfaction only when he's ready. In Tristan and Isolde, he takes it to an extreme, only resolving to the root harmony after 2.5h. He does so during this solo, climactically during the peak of her solo as she drinks hemlock, in despair of losing her lover. The climax only comes in the resolution of death/dying.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

gm farcasters. here's my favorite recording of the Liebestod ("Love Death") from Wagner's opera "Tristan and Isolde". The great midcentury soprano and diva Margaret Price singing here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjMwDbFng_g

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

zakhap.eth pfp

Totally! As long as maintenance costs don’t outweigh or overshadow moonshot work. And sometimes it’s better to kill your darlings and then rebuild in the future when there’s more clarity on the form the product/architecture should take.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

I tend to agree with you, but the simultaneity of moonshots I think can be a problem. Commit fully to launching something and then pivoting is totally fine imo

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

thanks for the reply! if i spun up a new keypair, added it to metamask, and made a new account, could I spin up new coins from that address programmatically + denominated with the creator coin from signin? I guess I could open up the sdk/abi and futz with it

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

feet on the ground, head in the clouds

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

zakhap.eth pfp

what's the current state of publishing (words) onchain? mirror => paragraph => ??? still paragraph? is paragraph the final form?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

@jacob do you know if new addresses posting to zora through the SDK will automatically receive a CreatorCoin and if so, how can I set the name? When using the SDK thereforeward, do I have to specify the CreatorToken as the denomination? I can't quite tell from digging around the protocol github where/how the CreatorCoins are deploy?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

zakhap.eth pfp

@clanker can you launch a token called "FOR THE DEVS" with the ticker $MULTICALL3 and this image

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction