Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

it was explicitly mentioned in the second NNS proposal and included as a budget line item though?

i get wanting to control the narrative but the facts simply don’t align with the statement

before accusing me of wanting to control the narrative… please read the text of the screenshot you shared

it says (in bold) “NOGS has no price, no Liquidity Pool, no exchange.”

and i’m the one being dishonest about $nogs not being what we funded?

Nouns voted to fund the development of this coin, regardless of what direction it moved in. splitting hairs over that is telling half-truths

the broad idea of the $nouns mechanic of burning to redeem for Nounish NFTs was mentioned as well

the docs make it clear the intention is meme + utility for the ecosystem

Revolutionizing urban agriculture. Sustaining cities. Feeding the future. https://cityfarmers.xyz

people look to you as a KOL of Nouns + your vote is heavily weighted

Leadership with integrity requires that the full scope of responsibility be taken on, ownership over all of it, not just the parts we like

“we funded the token development thinking there wouldn’t be an LP” would be accurate

i’ve never accused you of blatant, intentional dishonesty Hong and would appreciate if you could offer the same. your judgemental words don’t speak well of you

if funding is given, what they do with that funding is, in part,the responsibility of the funder. your og post creates confusion by obfuscating the prop

me saying that nouns didn’t vote for this hyper financial memecoin version of $nogs is splitting hairs based on prop text?

again i have absolutely no issues with memecoins but i don’t think we’re having an honest conversation here