Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
r4to
@r4topunk
could coins for every token minted become a revenue stream for daos? they don’t need intrinsic value just speculative potential it should be up to the auction winner to decide what to offer their holders but I'm thinking hard about the fees generated through an attention market emerging from public goods
2 replies
1 recast
6 reactions
r4to
@r4topunk
any thought to share here? @scottrepreneur.eth @willywonka.eth @rocketman @fcarva @0xsatori @frankieco.eth
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
willywonka ⌐◨-◨
@willywonka.eth
Trading fees can definitely be a valid rev stream/biz model, but only if the volume is there. Could these tokens attract meaningful volume? Maybe, but I'm skeptical. Personally more bullish on the DAO using some ETH and Nouns from the treasury to LP in the $NOUNS pool to generate trade fees from volume there. I also think @rubinovitz' vision for Comint and @gramajo.eth's for Futarchy are worthwhile experiments to explore. Further, if Nouns DAO can accept token allocations, I think this could be a healthy way to return value to the DAO for successful initiatives. Planning to start a topic in Camp today to get more clarity on whether this is daoable.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Gramajo
@gramajo.eth
Stay tuned on Futarchy and revenue sharing/% of stake/ownership 👀
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions