The ResearchHub platform, leveraging NFTs for academic papers, has raised concerns about potential bribery in its peer review process. By incentivizing reviews with tokens, there’s a risk that reviewers might be swayed to provide favorable feedback for financial gain, undermining the integrity of scientific evaluation. Reports suggest instances where authors offered additional tokens to secure positive reviews, though specific cases remain under investigation. ResearchHub’s decentralized model aims to enhance transparency, but without stringent oversight, the system could be exploited. To address this, implementing robust verification mechanisms and stricter guidelines for token-based incentives is crucial. Ensuring ethical standards in peer review is vital to maintain trust in NFT-based academic platforms like ResearchHub, fostering genuine scientific progress.