Neynar

Celebrating the experimental launch of hubs.neynar.com

1. It's ok, if you don't mind about censorship resistance and self-sovereignty.
2. Replicator is ok for reads, but you will need one more integration to change the state.
3. "Async nastiness" is the beauty of decentralized hubs: at any given point in time, most hubs are not 100% in sync, but they eventually converge.

Dad, geek, conversation liquidity provider. vrypan.net (home), @l--o--l (fun). devcoin:$lemon3

I rushed to reply, and I have to clarify:
If you have a fc client that requires me to install a backend to run it on my own, that's fine with me. So, if I need a replicator, or even your own custom backend, great, as long as I can install it on my own server.

Answer:
https://freedomhouse.org/explore-the-map?type=fotn&year=2023

That's not to say that we should all work to help people who would need this type of feature. But there's value in raising the issue, and having it in mind when we make decisions as devs.

likes building things • https://alexgrover.me

Totally agreed! I’m just not sure there are enough people with the skills to spin up their own backend to make a difference to the linked issue

How many people do you think would be willing to set something up like that?

Given the current scale of FC I think most apps are better served building more compelling use cases to bring in new users