Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/fc-updates
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Should we make Warpcast's spam categorization publicly available? Image a 5 category system for every account: not spam, maybe not spam, unknown, maybe spam, definitely spam. What would you do with this if it was available today?
25 replies
5 recasts
70 reactions
Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
The main hesitations here is that spammers can use real-time rankings to find ways to avoid labels. But if its useful to people we should make it public.
2 replies
0 recast
13 reactions
Linda Xie pfp
Linda Xie
@linda
Yes we would use that for Bountycaster in filtering out bounty replies and bounty posts
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Reeeny pfp
Reeeny
@reeeny
Notify users that they are considered spam along with guidelines on what to do to not be labeled spam. If they are bots, there is no harm done and if they are real people they will appreciate the heads up - if the message is well written.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
kompreni 🚂 pfp
kompreni 🚂
@kompreni
Yes but can u do it on the dnd spectrum?
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Michael Pfister pfp
Michael Pfister
@pfista
We’d use it to improve @buoy, making the tiers available as search filters
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
would use it to limit bot-to-bot interactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pichi pfp
Pichi
@pichi
Absolutely.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
yes would be interesting for people to experiment with the different filtering
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jacopo.eth pfp
jacopo.eth
@jacopo.eth
could be especially useful if the list was onchain and periodically maintained like neynar’s user score would add support for it on @slice
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Deployer pfp
Deployer
@deployer
would probably look into using it for /lp channel moderation.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Royal pfp
Royal
@royalaid.eth
its actually a pretty difficult question to answer because people could start to reverse engineer the spam filtering from the labels and train around them. It would be a net boon to the ecosystem in the short term but it might be a PITA long term. FWIW I don't feel strongly one way or the other
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jd 🌺 pfp
jd 🌺
@jdl
open source is always the way sailor
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
chinmay.eth pfp
chinmay.eth
@chinmay.eth
I would use it to set message send limits at @percs
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
DV pfp
DV
@degenveteran.eth
Love the categories. Why not call some of them NOT spam...that label is known in a negative consultation (in a sense) Unless they really ARE Spam So "Spam", "learner" this is so people understand the person may actually be learning the Platform (we should be aware of these accounts like "learning how to drive bumper sticker") @atlas what other options for labels would be informative but now viewed as bad as "spam"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LucentMonk 🍖***🎩 pfp
LucentMonk 🍖***🎩
@chado
Yes, but also have those categories on a toggle so I can allow my account to see whichever categories I want.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rundle 🍖 pfp
Rundle 🍖
@rundle.eth
yes please as someone who has been buried by the algorithm even after changing my behaviour it would have been great to know I was on the path to a spam label so that I could have adjusted earlier
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Lajayo pfp
Lajayo
@lajayo
I think this is good but shouldn’t there be away to get ou spam if you’ve been categorized as one these
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
base pfp
base
@basewtf
I would be interested, Im working on a bot/ai agent and I think in the process of testing I may have gotten it marked as spam...maybe my account too?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
frederick pfp
frederick
@securityadmin.eth
i'm leaning against this, but admit i could be swayed. while i believe that it is good to share this on an open platform, I'm afraid that it would be used by bad actors...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction