Artificial Intelligence (AI)

tweeted this bc a) too long to post here, b) much of SV doesn't seem to grasp that low-effort, AI-generated replies can come from verified humans as much as they come from automated bots.

blessing and curse that crypto social has to deal with this first.

The new @digg reboot beta will launch with multiple paths to provide proof of human. the number below is troubling and will quickly ramp left unchecked. we're working with partners here and our own zkproof technical solutions to protect privacy 🙏🚫🤖.

a common blind spot i see in references to the Em Dash conspiracy:

people assume that AI-generated posts are the result of bots and, therefore, "proof of human" can help fix it.

this is naive, imo.

there are plenty of real humans using ChatGPT to farm attention.

and they do

ted (on farcaster)

tweeted this bc a) too long to post here, b) much of SV doesn't seem to grasp that low-effort, AI-generated replies can come from verified humans as much as they come from automated bots.

blessing and curse that crypto social has to deal with this first.

https://x.com/tednotlasso/status/1922106036724584465

helping build farcaster | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina | “lucky me, lucky mud”

I think it’s quite simple, deep down if you look closely you’ll almost always know what is AI generated and can identify it with little evidences that gpt usually uses e.g over analysis of the same thing over and over, or the use of unnecessary dashes. IMO that’s why every social platform gives a user choice, your ability to use your choice and scale of preference will either make or marr your feed. If more of us do this ultimately we will reduce how much AI hijacks attention.