πΆππππΏβ¨
@toyboy.eth
Time to cast some irl stuff, Recently I've come across this monstrosity on a new social housing project where Iβm an intern doing the sewer and roadworks. The entire thing was designed with pavers on a 200mm lean concrete base on top of a 250mm recycled aggregate sub base, already overkill but then came this work of art. In order to "protect" the existing Oak, instead of pavers they wanted a monolithic reinforced concrete slab to minimize ground pressure. Specs called for a 180mm slab with 2 layers or 16mm rebar "nets" with 100mm spacing. (in freedom units: 7in slab, 5/8in rebar 4in spacing) I had already seen some silly specs and overkill design before but this one took it to a whole new level.
3 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
wait i don't have context for what it should be. what's wrong here? they just did way too much? and to protect what oak?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
πΆππππΏβ¨
@toyboy.eth
Massive overdesign,This level of reinforcement is excessive for a surface carrying only pedestrian or light vehicular loads. Basically the cost, labor, and material usage are exteremely disproportionate to the functional demands
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
BrixBountyFarm π©
@brixbounty
So who gets the kickbacks for the extra infra?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
πΆππππΏβ¨
@toyboy.eth
Head engineer
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction