Farcaster

I lost like ~1000 Farcaster (not protocol) followers again, these algo changes are wild. A lot of people that just gained level 2 but lost it again.

We're waiting for @akshaan's labels dataset update to show you your correct levels in the mini app again


tipopolis.hamst.art/tipopolis?framesv1=spammer&fid=230238&ticket=1SGKT2Av

hamst.art $hamster /hamster 
martinvr.eth 
deploy.degen.eth

Interests: crypto, economics, TA & blockchain related innovations | 🔗 https://linktr.ee/cryptonjal 🔗 https://dune.com/nhejyht

noun seven three zero | onchain experimentation maxi @ zerorights.media, zeropod.xyz, @betrmint, the /yellow collective

To indicate the effect of the changing spam labels on the data with active FIDs, I have tabled the data from April based on the last three spam label datasets.

Share of spam label 0 decreased from 66.6% to 54.5%
Share of spam label 2 increased from 16.1% to 40.6%

The data with spam label flows (courtesy of @mvr) clearly shows that the netflow in the dataset with spam labels is in favour of spam label 2.

Yes, based on their GitHub uploads.

11-12% difference is huge. Me too by the way (lost around 30 - 40).

Still less than gained the last two updates, but also got a bunch new followers after casting figures about FC/spam labels.
Perhaps this policy was too lenient.

Yes, based on their GitHub uploads.

11-12% difference is huge. Me too by the way (lost around 30 - 40).

Still less than gained the last two updates, but also got a bunch new followers after casting figures about FC/spam labels.
Perhaps this policy was too lenient.

https://farcaster.xyz/cryptonjal/0x7677c115

Checks out % wise 😅

Nice wave, @cryptonjal you're tracking that right?