matthew pfp
matthew
@matthew
a bear thesis for creator coins is that crypto as a subculture and/or cb/zora as platforms have not done nearly enough to educate normie creators on why they should do one in a way that does not feel extractive or scammy. some questions that one might answer: - what do you do with your coin once created? - how do you safely exit without burning your audience (e.g. LPing) - how are they not extractive? how do you sell that to your audience? - what are examples of creators that have done this well? the decision to launch one is the function of one person asking themselves "are the vibes right" before they hit that button. and sans the above, my guess is that the vast majority of good creators will say no.
12 replies
3 recasts
41 reactions

Oliver pfp
Oliver
@timewarp
Have you explored the design space of the curator feeds ($pro) instead of direct creator coins? In this paradigm, creators continue to make content but a new market participate is formed (curator) that signals value that consumers can invest in that's addictive towards the creators
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Oliver pfp
Oliver
@timewarp
In this marketplace, creators tradeoff some of the financial upside to curators but with the benefit of a broadening base of speculative curators willing to draw attn towards their content
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

matthew pfp
matthew
@matthew
too many layers of financialization IMO
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Oliver pfp
Oliver
@timewarp
Fair point
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Oliver pfp
Oliver
@timewarp
I would argue that's the same w creator coins
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction