noice

one-to-many micropayments (v0 w/ @luc) 

>he launched a new product recently @faircaster 
>has a first investment announcement today
>needs eyeballs
>commits $150 
>gets 1200 likes / 700 recasts in the first hour

stuff of legends, now he has 1000s of people paying attention to what is announcement today evening 

a v0 in microincentives on the feed for us at noice

this will become critical for launching new products, features, tokens, partnerships, announcements et al on open social, soon

Faircaster is a VC agent that finds Farcaster projects early

his request explicitly mentions spam labels = 2, 

https://github.com/warpcast/labels more info on the spam labels here

designer & maker (trust over attention), creator of IRL walk & talk club // prev founding team rara.social, Yak Collective, EV grantee (Mercatus), IIT Kanpur CS

not sure how good the fc spam labeling is at the moment, but still, (I noticed from quick glance) 95% of people who are liking, recasting, following @luc or @faircaster are seemingly spammy. 

they will not get rewarded though via noicebot so maybe it disincentivizes them over time and then the real number of valuable attention becomes more visible?

Is this incorrect?

I am curious: 95% of likes/recasts are from engagement farmers/bots (i call them locusts)

How valuable is their attention to @faircaster or @luc ?

I have such mixed feelings about this. microincentives disproportionately attract farmers and low-quality users. (same problem with small-$ airdrops distributed via other means.)

on the other hand, AFAIK the algo doesn't differentiate between organic engagement and paid, so there's a big boost to be had from your post being hyper-engaging

building @dau and @boostxyz to help app devs grow onchain with tokens

@flynn.eth   Came across your post on launching soon. FYI