keccers
@keccers.eth
The fully doxxed have more skin in the game than the pseuds, which is why it’s perplexing to me how in many instances pseuds are more easily able to accrue trust A pseud’s opinion should be doubly discounted. They have no reputation risk
25 replies
7 recasts
99 reactions
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Counterpoint: Wealthy doxxed have less to lose than poor pseuds. In America your reputation is only as fallible as your ability to stay solvent through the extremely brief periods of cancellation. For example, I have more to lose from being pro crypto and pro socialist amongst my peers in the Canadian small-medium business world, than I could meaningfully gain in credibility by doxxing. Meanwhile rich folks who maintain massive follower bases on here and other social media and have had no risk to career have literally been accused of corruption, embezzlement, fraud, sexual assault, and sedition. See my point?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Also isn’t the whole ethos of crypto “don’t trust, verify?” You can read a Polynya’s opinions on crypto and decide if you agree. Check their math, gpt-splain their logical fallacies, confirm the truthfulness of statements and note bias, all in the same way you could do for some “doxxed” founder. Additionally, doxxed wealthy people may have pseudonymous alts, they certainly have hidden wallets profiting off the “trust” they have earned, swaying (read: manipulating) markets—it’s basically the name of the game in this world. So yeah, I don’t buy it personally. I’d prefer full pseudo to relying on old school trust in a much more nefarious and gameable online world.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
