Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
Yesterday when I was driving back home, I was talking with my wife about how in some companies, mediocricy gets promoted no matter what. Interestingly, through the conversation in lots of cases those people in charge are there because they are friends of, or liked by someone inside but not based at all on experience or skills. That got me thinking that nowadays most companies can have real-time metrics about the goals to achieve and how they are performing against those KPIs. Suddenly I realized that lots of middle-managers will be not required anymore because in general that "management" could be done by AI. Assuming AI will not have any bias, that's impossible and we know it, that friendly/endogamic game might end? What do you think? Could AI reduce or even remove endogamic jobs? BIG NOTE: I don't like AI handling and managing people, but I can see this as a possible future. Actually, I think this would not be possible in EU in order to protect employees.
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Justin Hunter
@polluterofminds
The need for management is a symptom of company size and HR protection policies more than it is about actually needing to "manage". And the role itself is less about understanding metrics and more about listening to complaints and pacifying employee interpersonal issues. Now, if the employees are also AI, then AI managers work great. 😂
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
But in many of these companies, when you talk to the employees, they'll tell you that the managers don't do anything, except micromanage and get people mad. That's why I was wondering that, when this type of job exists, and there's no real reason to keep it, maybe AI will conquer it
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction