change my mind:

walk and talk is just mansplaining in video format

that's valid for what we've seen so far.

then again, video can show more  of surroundings and walks of life, humanizing the speaker's point.

would you characterize an AMA thread in the same way?

𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖙𝖚𝖒 𝖆𝖉 𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖗𝖆

video essays are considerably more "splainy" regardless of production value.

still can be good, just wondering how walk-and-talks are overbearing in that way.

walk and talk with no editing is like straightshotting a post from brain to phone

video essays are deliberate and produced

they are not the same?

do you think video essays are mistaken?

should video be for visceral experience?