vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I often wonder about the actual context of discussions around "the algorithm". Do I want an algorithm that is better at... A. showing me the best content? B. getting me the widest distribution? It's such a difficult discussion to have in public, because 1. No one in the 1% that creates content is ready to accept these two directions may be conflicting, ie. that my content is not that great. 2. The typical 90% that is mostly reading/liking is obviously in favor of A, but they are (by definition) not vocal. 3. Even between the 1-10% of users who post content, some are interested in writing (they want to share, and usually they only care about a few, specific, users reading them, their circle) and those who are interested in getting read (they will create based on what gets them attention). Good luck to anyone trying to reconcile all these in a public discourse.
4 replies
1 recast
41 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
actually easy on tiktok to see this. my best videos do well in the algo, the mid videos do okay, and bad videos flop. it's really helpful to have data to see this.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
