Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/ted
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
in the spirit of respectful debate: most of our FC followers are airdrop/free mint farmers so they'd agree, not disagree, with this :) agree we need to design for positive contributions BUT its more nuanced than that imo clicking a button =/= microwork, volatile token requiring 24/7 tracking =/= economic prosperity
4 replies
3 recasts
43 reactions
Kyle
@banta
so much of airdrop farming is just playing spray and pray and hoping. doing nothing really of value but to further evangelize/distribute the "protocol" (which most are valueless "projects" with no real plan/product) in hopes that they can get something for nothing. hard agree.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Qđ©
@qsteak.eth
Clicking a button, no. Now, on ramping from fiat to crypto, converting from your starting asset to the needed one and for chain gas, likely bridging with a convoluted protocol, most of the time putting your money into an unproven protocol to allow them to work the big out on me. Maybe a bit more than micro work.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Max
@max-melmed
What value do you see in airdrops? @jesse.base.eth do you believe any behavior related to air drops or free mints is bad for the space?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
xky
@xky
âŻïž
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
raulonastool.eth đ°
@raulonastool
People always find a way to game the system based on where the incentives are. We see this in regional differences in architecture due to building codes and taxes. Dutch canals in Amsterdam tax based on frontage so you see lots of tall, skinny buildings. Other places tax windows so people board up windows in their home
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sum
@sum
getting many new followers, and while itâs cool, i wish there was some way to restrict for quality. 1000 quality followers >>> all i'm reminded of your casts everytime i see the âfollow, recast, comment for xyzâ and have trouble seeing it as anything but a red flag now.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
