Adam
@adam-
Interesting take, but there's another side that Bravo is missing here. As someone who's worked in the industry, those $200M Marvel movies essentially fertilize everything else the studio produces. While those films may be their main bet, they also need to cover the themselves with a bunch of smaller budget films to address various audiences that make up the movie going public. This way they don't miss out on films that organically usurp manufactured blockbusters. Dark horses will always emerge in an-otherwise saturated marketplace. Thats what keeps it interesting, and why those weird, subtle, personal films that usually come out during the spring and awards season keep things from being too lopsided.
5 replies
1 recast
12 reactions
🎥🌳
@tcw
Who is making Marvel movies that are then going on to produce weird, subtle personal films? Seems like the actors and directors just keep coming back for easy paychecks. All the post teams at ILM are just working on Marvel year round
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam
@adam-
Ryan Coogler. He wouldn't have gotten the budget to make Sinners if he didn't prove himself with Black Panther. That was considered a risk to make since it wasn't some pre-established IP. Sure, there are actors and directors are dependent on more cliché films, but for every visionary there's a dozen people who just see it as a job.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction