everything makes me laugh haha
give premium fees back to past owners
base.namespace.tech/enskeychain
bento.me/broke

there has been an org-wide shift in focus entirely towards ENS on L2s very recently - we aren’t just exploring, we’re executing

yeah great that its finally a priority, but ppl have been asking for this forever and ens has said that its coming for years. prob will take some more yrs🤷‍♂️

we have been progressing with ENS support on L2 continuously for years, things like CCIP-read, EVMGateway, L2 reverse registrar, etc, are all built and part of the L2 roadmap

as for bridging solutions to actually manage a name entirely on L2, with the current registry design it pretty much requires a workaround of some kind rather than being native to the protocol, which is something that we didn’t want to do, and are now tackling the core issue of

the bull run has been unfortunate timing because most of our L2 scaling solutions are just now becoming ready for production, so ENS has felt inaccessible for many, especially from the ENS app

yeah theres def not been nothing but managing broke.eth and setting its record still is as expensive as it was last bull run. and subs
most L2s dont have .eth integrated, why? I thought because ENS hasnt yet decided how to best implement