devs

@strat.eth

54 Following

17 Followers

devs pfp

You ‘found’ that?? Lucky!

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

devs pfp

It was months ago. I don’t remember which app. I could only discern one word, which I was also able to recognize, taking my attention. The word was ‘Paganini’.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

devs pfp

A long while I saw a cover of a book in a picture you posted. It makes sense. Good taste.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

devs pfp

“Plasmas” up to a kilometer in size and behaving similarly to multicellular organisms, over 200 miles above Earth within the thermosphere; “exhibit all the necessary properties to qualify them as candidates for inorganic living matter.” Tsytovich, et al. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=131506

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

devs pfp

We will learn how to speak Dolphin. https://blog.google/technology/ai/dolphingemma/

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

devs pfp

Much less tenebrae than Liszt; It is rumored Paganini used to play for free late at night, since many couldn’t afford the high priced tickets. I always pictured what would it be like to walk by a cemetery, and hear his melodies, live. This is one of my favorite renditions: https://youtube.com/watch?v=0jXXWBt5URw

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

devs pfp

https://youtube.com/watch?v=yUl7LBLSpr0

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

devs pfp

Can individuals be intrinsically evil/virtuous, or is there only the ever-changing present? For fun, going further, we can also understand each, as differing expressions of human nature. Rather than static exponents, the opposing entities could be considered facets of our whole, like notes of the song which narrates our reality.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

devs pfp

Such a cool photo. Do you generally shoot on HDR? Awesome view of the Milky Way.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

devs pfp

Certainty is life’s currency.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

devs pfp

I agree. Less valuable content -> less engagement -> less new users. Forms a parallel to the data minimalist approach intended from other changes, likely efficiency driven. I’ll be optimistic and say this also is temporary.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

devs pfp

After this exhibition they explained that, “the artist need not fear being automated out of existence; rather, as they see it, the computer will free the artist for creation, unburdened by the tedium of the mechanics.” The following year (1966) one of the 2 original scientists behind the computer gen cards made a study called “HUMAN OR MACHINE” were a plotter imitated Dutch painter Piet Mondrian’s style, and then was compared to the original. The study found most people being unable to correctly identify the pictures creator, and to have a preference for the computer generated one 😆 Thought I share it. https://specificobject.com/objects/info.cfm?object_id=7563 http://noll.uscannenberg.org/Art%20Papers/Mondrian.pdf

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

devs pfp

Why is it giving more control to channel members, at the expense of limiting (or decreasing efficiency of) viewership, be a beneficial change? I can see how it could decrease engagement. Only out of curiosity.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

devs pfp

It makes me wonder about the level of influence from its (ours) centralization-based society. Several of the ‘main actors’ are likely to continue being protagonists. And with them, their mindset is to be selectively predisposed to further spread.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

devs pfp

“The thoughts which are expressed to me by a piece of music which I love are not too indefinite to be put into words, but on the contrary too definite.”

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

devs pfp

It sounds like someone wonderful to converse with! I find his ideas on individuality especially intriguing. I get a sense he placed the betterment of everyone over the self. Not narrowing the focus to specifics, but instead encouraging for more cohesive benefits. There are deep truths to this, which are difficult to acknowledge on the surface. Thanks for sharing!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

devs pfp

Having said this, I would imagine any proficient scientist having a difficult time being an atheist.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

devs pfp

One is empirical, the other isn’t. One surrenders to the unknown, the other one to the known. Any scientist who clings to theories as divine truths, is not a good representation. A theory is precisely that, and that only.

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

devs pfp

An ingredient which can be perceived throughout, but one that should never be made the main focus of the dish. Otherwise becoming unbearably distasteful for everyone.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

GIGAMΞSH pfp

3 replies

0 recast

31 reactions