social

Farcaster

The good news is that doing social media algorithms is *hard*, so no one really should be faulting Merkle.

I'm sure you've seen the complaints on X (so much so they released their algorithm, never updated it, and now claim to be Grok LLM powered). You've seen the complaints here on Farcaster. 

There are complaints on Threads too!

We once had only "following", which I guess many did get used to (the Facebook timeline/news feed). We were told algorithms would be better for us, but even facebook hasn't solved this since 2006!

Maybe the only people that cracked algorithmic discovery so far has been TikTok. And no, we haven't seen an update to Monolith since they talked about it. https://github.com/bytedance/monolith

hypothesis: text/image feed algos are "bad" because of a lack of preference revealing signals the algos have to determine what you like. the only reliable signals you can get from these feeds are explicit engagement (reactions/clicks/shares)

watch time is a very strong "interestingness" signal

Imo the ad scene has definitely moved from clicks to time on screen, and nothing does it better than enabling addictive behaviors

DX Engineer | DevRel at OpenZeppelin | Building orbiter.host | stevedylan.dev/links | opinions are my own

yup, and to be clear, protocol wise, we don't have time on screen, this is implemented in the client level