Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
i give farcaster a hard time because i'm dissatisfied with the status quo of online social and feel like we have a genuine opportunity to do things differently this is why it frustrates me when farcaster leans into the same things that make traditional online social shitty thinking about it more i realized i don't actually know what farcaster is trying to achieve. does it want to solve fair distribution for creators? does it want to solve deplatforming and censorship? does it want to be a mini app platform? does it want to be a place where people make genuine connections? does it want to be a place people go for entertainment? does it want to be a composable social graph? does it want to be an app for people to discover crypto apps? i genuinely have no idea. this vacuum of direction invites people to shape their own narratives about farcaster and leads to everyone being disappointed when decisions are made that don't align with their idea of what it should be
24 replies
20 recasts
164 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
Being “sufficiently decentralized” doesn’t mean anything at best and means decentralization LARPing at worst
2 replies
1 recast
43 reactions
henry
@henry
Sufficient decentralization: - censorship resistant by design - onchain resilient identity protected by private key (portable) - innovation is not gated, we already see the benefit of this - storage technically replaceable / openly marketable - if warpcast bans you, you are free to use another client (lol) Sorry that you see this as LARPing maybe go back to twitter or smth idk
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
i will admit that this was a bit harsh at best it means meaningful decentralization i will maintain that at worst it's still decentralization LARP
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
henry
@henry
mmm yes at best it’s a fully decentralized social protocol, which would be fascinating. at worst it’s a product using the currently popular term sufficient decentralization to boost growth and sales, which would be a shame. Still an interesting experiment.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction