Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Bitfloorsghost
@bitfloorsghost.eth
The issue with requiring people basically never sell airdrops in order to qualify for future airdrops is two fold 1. It once again rewards people who already have money For many people here a 50 dollar airdrop is significant, so it’s a bit exploitative to punish them for using money that could improve their lives. This is no issue for people who already have a lot of money - rich get richer. 2. It’s ultimately an attempt at gaming normal market forces, which never works out It’s basically a form of soft staking, and we all know staking doesn’t work to prevent sell pressure Ultimately, if you make a good product, people won’t sell it. It’s on the teams to make their product attractive so we want to hold it, not just threaten people if they want to improve their lives. Carrot, not the stick
23 replies
8 recasts
76 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Airdrops are evolving into more efficient marketing spend. Traditional airdrops are like brand advertising. Big numbers, happy accounts posting on social media, but no CAC/LTV. They will start looking more performance ads. I spend X to make Y. Regulatory change in the US will accelerate this. I don’t make the rules, just observing how it’s changing.
5 replies
2 recasts
29 reactions
sonofsteppes
@sonofsteppes
I think those who write such posts that cannot be infringed upon for the Quick sale of distribution and reward them further are here only for the sake of quick profit and in the future there will be no Loyalty from such people. In my opinion, many projects that distribute here do not have Investments because of this, the pool of rewards that are financed from their own personal funds is small. Such projects need a loyal community that will support them at least by not selling the token until they form a sustainable business model!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
