Content pfp
Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jesse.base.eth 🔵 pfp
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
do people think it's Bad that @ethereumintern_ coined this poster on @zora, earned $217, had 615 people collect it, and now has 1% of the supply he can use to pay people to hang the poster around the world? that seems Good to me https://x.com/ethereumintern_/status/1911403125711192339?s=46
10 replies
11 recasts
90 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
I don’t think anyone thinks that’s bad
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jesse.base.eth 🔵 pfp
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
I actually think a lot of people do - or they think someone doing the same thing when it's not about Ethereum is Bad
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

0xmons ✝️ pfp
0xmons ✝️
@xmon.eth
i think it's bad because it's not something that you can do over and over diminishing returns per marginal coin you issue not a fan of the implicit moral framing here ("is it bad if person X made money, especially if person X is eth aligned") but i'll contest the object-level claim first
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
well even then you are not saying the act itself is bad, but rather the expectation of repeated continuous behavior. which i think is a separate convo from the original question
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Leeward Bound pfp
Leeward Bound
@leewardbound
yeah just like littering paper wasye or spitting gum on on the sidewalk isn't bad because it doesn't directly hurt anyone, but it's not repeatable, see ecology is stupid
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

six pfp
six
@six
?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Leeward Bound pfp
Leeward Bound
@leewardbound
yep you should check that logic huh?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

six pfp
six
@six
no? i am not following the analogy littering is bad - it harms shared physical spaces. launching a token does not harm shared anything. people can choose to buy it or just ignore it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Leeward Bound pfp
Leeward Bound
@leewardbound
i feel like chidi on The Good Place explaining morality in simple terms to supposed adults, BUT JUDGING THE GOODNESS OR BADNESS OF A THING IS NOT JUST ABOUT THE IMMEDIATE FIRST-ORDER EFFECTS YOU MUST ALSO CONSIDER THE LONG TERM EFFECTS OF THIS BEHAVIOR, THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE BEHAVIOR AT SCALE, AND THE SECOND ORDER EFFECTS OF NORMALIZING IT IF SOMETHING IS NOT REPEATABLE OR SUSTAINABLE, IT IS LIKELY ALSO INHERENTLY BAD, HARMFUL, OR IMMORAL AT LARGE
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction