@shanny

This is a really thoughtful piece — appreciate you sharing it The “infinite garden” framing resonates, especially the risk of systems becoming self-referential and optimizing for yield over real impact I think the tension I’m exploring is slightly different: Not how to create infinite systems, but how to create persistent ones that stay grounded in real-world outcomes In the SportFi context: • yield isn’t the goal • it’s a mechanism • the goal is sustained funding for things like local sport + infrastructure So the question becomes: How do you design systems where: → capital can persist → but impact stays anchored in the real world → and governance sits with the communities affected Feels like that balance is the hard part Curious how you think about keeping these systems “grounded” over time?

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions