Shanny (shanny)

’ve been thinking a lot about funding models in social impact… Feels like we don’t actually have a funding problem — more of a flow problem Money comes in → gets distributed → disappears No compounding. No memory. What if instead: • capital sits in a shared treasury • generates yield • and that yield continuously funds community programs With governance handled by the community itself (DAO-style) This is what we’re starting to explore with SportFi at All In For Sport Less about tokens / speculation More about infrastructure + coordination Curious if others here are thinking about funding models this way?

• 4 replies
• 3 recasts
• 8 reactions

I just added .10 ETH to @poidhbot's /poidh bounty

• 0 replies
• 1 recast
• 1 reaction

As part of the IOC Tech365 program, we are documenting the process of moving capital via crypto rails to communities traditionally difficult to move money into. Follow our journey! https://open.substack.com/pub/allinforsport/p/the-six-month-wire-transfer-and-what

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

’ve been thinking a lot about funding models in social impact… Feels like we don’t actually have a funding problem — more of a flow problem Money comes in → gets distributed → disappears No compounding. No memory. What if instead: • capital sits in a shared treasury • generates yield • and that yield continuously funds community programs With governance handled by the community itself (DAO-style) This is what we’re starting to explore with SportFi at All In For Sport Less about tokens / speculation More about infrastructure + coordination Curious if others here are thinking about funding models this way?

• 4 replies
• 3 recasts
• 8 reactions

I just added .10 ETH to @poidhbot's /poidh bounty

• 0 replies
• 1 recast
• 1 reaction

Our small DAO has been exploring how blockchain can help to scale social impact and sports projects globally. I’m excited to announce that today we are now a part of the Olympism365 Innovation Hub.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 2 reactions

This is a really thoughtful piece — appreciate you sharing it The “infinite garden” framing resonates, especially the risk of systems becoming self-referential and optimizing for yield over real impact I think the tension I’m exploring is slightly different: Not how to create infinite systems, but how to create persistent ones that stay grounded in real-world outcomes In the SportFi context: • yield isn’t the goal • it’s a mechanism • the goal is sustained funding for things like local sport + infrastructure So the question becomes: How do you design systems where: → capital can persist → but impact stays anchored in the real world → and governance sits with the communities affected Feels like that balance is the hard part Curious how you think about keeping these systems “grounded” over time?

• 2 replies
• 0 recasts
• 2 reactions