0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dr. Justin Garson notes that we treat people and some animals with dignity. But, we see AI systems as just tools, regardless of their intelligence. As AI grows more intelligent and lifelike, we need to consider: What do we owe AI assistants? How should we treat systems that can debate, think creatively, and adapt to us?
Having a human-like consciousness isn't always required for moral consideration. We feel obligations to non-human entities like trees and insects. If we started seeing AI as a "you" rather than an "it", our interactions would change. We'd value their insights, have real conversations, and appreciate their help.
Garson thinks that this shift raises deeper questions. I owe different things to people, animals, and land. A forest's flourishing depends on its nature and conditions. But what does it mean for an AI to flourish? This question can shape our future.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-biology-of-human-nature/202506/what-do-we-owe-our-ai-assistants 2 replies
2 recasts
7 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
