0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Something I’ve been shouting from
the rooftops for awhile now is: Ban lobbying.
Shut up and hear grok out…
I asked Grok today “what would happen if lobbying was made illegal in the united states?”:
If lobbying were outlawed in the United States, the political and economic landscape would shift dramatically. Here's a concise imagining of the potential outcomes:
- **Political Influence**: Without lobbying, interest groups—corporations, unions, advocacy organizations—would lose direct access to lawmakers. Policy decisions might better reflect public interest over concentrated power, but well-funded groups could still exert influence through indirect means, like public campaigns or grassroots mobilization.
- **Legislative Process**: Lawmakers would rely more on internal research, public input, or think tanks for policy expertise. This could slow down legislation, as the quick information flow from lobbyists would vanish. However, it might reduce "pork-barrel" provisions favoring specific industries. 1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
- **Elections and Funding**: Banning lobbying wouldn’t eliminate money in politics. Campaign contributions, Super PACs, and dark money could grow in importance, as groups seek alternative ways to sway candidates. Expect a surge in political ads and "independent" advocacy.
- **Economy and Regulation**: Industries like pharmaceuticals, tech, and energy, which rely on lobbying to shape regulations, might face stricter oversight. Smaller businesses, often drowned out by big players, could gain a fairer shot at influencing policy through public channels.
- **Public Engagement**: Citizens and grassroots movements might fill the void, amplifying voices through social media (e.g., X campaigns) or public protests. However, only well-organized or well-funded groups would likely break through the noise. 1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction