Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/worldcoin
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
sharing a few speculative thoughts / questions if @worldcoin app becomes a social app, after reading this @bankless piece by @robinson. half-baked hypothesis: 1. would shift world from identity-focused to content-focused, which is *hard* 2. user behavior, engagement, and content becomes highly valuable training data for OpenAI (if users consent into it; opt-in should be imperative here) 3. then, in theory, $WLD could be the mechanism to compensate users for providing training data (in contrast to reddit selling user data but users get no cut whatsoever) open questions i can't stop thinking about: 1. how do you measure which data is most valuable? not all data is equal 2. who gets to choose who the data is sold to and at what cost? 3. does incentivizing data actually warp the data? a la goodhart's law problem "when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure" https://www.bankless.com/read/world-openai-social-network
9 replies
8 recasts
105 reactions
RyanFox.eth
@ryanfox.eth
1) How do you measure which data is valuable: Start with usage. • Unused data is worthless. • Data’s value is directly tied to how much “state” it changes. If I tell you it’s raining and that changes your state from “no umbrella” to “umbrella”, that data has some value. If I tell 30,000 listeners via radio broadcast it’s raining and 10,000 people’s state changes to “umbrella” that data has more value. It’s obviously much more complicated than that, and not at all even. There’s no unified value calculation. But measuring “usage” is a starting point. I don’t know if you’re watching Kevin Rose and Alexis Ohanian but Digg.com is rebooting and they seem to be working on this very problem very hard. 🧐
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
EulerLagrangodamus
@eulerlagrange
They def are
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
