Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Coop pfp
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
We make crypto way too complicated for the average individual to understand.
5 replies
0 recast
30 reactions

tomu pfp
tomu
@tomu
I think the focus was wrong. You don't need to explain the technology to be used, but make it consumable. And we are at that phase now. It's getting easier to use a crypto app in the past months.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rolf Hoefer pfp
Rolf Hoefer
@rolfhoefer
Great point. Though the jargon will need to evolve. And tech still comes first. Example for both points? "Account abstraction" 😁
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

tomu pfp
tomu
@tomu
passkeys everywhere is the new vibe
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

itai (building dynamic.xyz) pfp
itai (building dynamic.xyz)
@itai
I struggle with the passkey point honestly. On the one hand people don't know what it means, but on the other mainstream services (Google, Github, Amazon etc) do actually refer to it as passkeys.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Rolf Hoefer pfp
Rolf Hoefer
@rolfhoefer
I think they chose it because of the semantic similarity to password and passphrases but I also think it's not that clear. Brute repeating it into people's consciousness might eventually work though--or that's the hope 🔨
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

tomu pfp
tomu
@tomu
@itai agree with both here. I had a call last week with our designers to implement it and he also struggled with the passkey concept
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction