ultimatum, a 2 player game

there is a pot of money (100 coins)

player #1 can decide how to split up the money
player #2 can accept or decline
If accepted, both players keep their split; if declined, both get nothing

player #1 should choose a 99/1 split
player #2 should accept it

the problem with game theory is that it assumes rational agents

working on meta.matcha.xyz, yc alum, @orangedao

yes i'm watching game theory videos on youtube again instead of getting a good sleep score

wait did you play my mini app?

we can run it back. i ran an async game for a week and shelved it to refresh it with a diff game.

I just want us to have fun | Cofounder @ Resolve (YC) - spatial tech for construction. FC tinkering: @livecaster @harmonybot | Ask me about /f1 /vr /orange-dao

the extractooors had a scary lead for a while but eventually things normalized and a decent human being won the pot lol

https://farcaster.xyz/sayangel/0x88c0f293

oh nice i didn’t know you built this but have read about the tit for tat strategy for a recurring prisoners dilemma game

wait did you play my mini app?

we can run it back. i ran an async game for a week and shelved it to refresh it with a diff game.

https://tit-for-tat.vercel.app/

I don't think game theory assumes anything. In my mind GT is more about the possible alternative universes that may unfold given a certain choice. 

My question for your game idea above would be why anyone would want to play that game in the first place. What is the upside?