RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
πŸŽ‰ πŸ§΅πŸ‘‡ Happy New Year to all! So, it's finally happened: i'm a PhD on Economics and Social Sciences, on cryptocurrencies governance! πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‰
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
πŸŽ‰ Let's start 2025 with a thread presenting my thesis entitled "Beyond Codes: Discreet and Polycentric Governance of Cryptocurrencies (CM) Bitcoin and Ethereum Revealed by Their Crises." The general presentation will follow my defense summary.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
πŸ“œ Bitcoin was launched 16 years ago. A constellation of new assets has emerged along with cryptocurrencies (CC) phenomenon. Crypto markets have surpassed $3.5 trillion in capitalization, with Bitcoin representing 56% and Ethereum, second, accounting for ~70% of the DEFI sector
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
The media, gray literature, and academic sources still use inconsistent designations for these objects, labeling CM as "virtual payment methods" excluded from the monetary field, due to the (presumed) absence of trusted third parties enabled by blockchain/cryptography...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
πŸ“œThese definitions are inspired by pioneering ambitions, asserting that technical consensus replaces political consensus, eliminating discretionary interventions and uncertainties. This libertarian "dream" or "nightmare" intrigued me as it contradicted my understanding of money.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
πŸ” I examine these liberal-technicist ambitions posited in syllogism. By approaching CC as socio-technical infrastructures, I critique these premises, avoiding the pitfalls of both technologism and sociologism, grounding the perspectives of both coiners and their detractors.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
πŸ“š Theoretical Framework: Integrating the frameworks of Francophone Monetary Institutionalism and STS, I analyze CC as constructed social and technical objects. Controversies & crises are both a meeting point for these frameworks and a privileged observation point for their gov.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
πŸ› οΈ Methodology: I conducted a multi-sited qualitative investigation in two phases (2015-2020) with four access mechanisms. This allowed me to collect rich and diverse data, capturing CC as socio-technical infrastructures, relational networks renegotiated through uses & practice
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
πŸ“œ Summary of the Thesis: I achieve this through three chapters: a socio-history of the emergence of Bitcoin and Ethereum infrastructures, a critical analysis of the monetary status of CC, and a sociology of crises revealing their polycentric governance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
🌟Contributions 1: Within the framework of infrastructural studies, I unveil the invisible and carnivalesque nature of CC. As socio-technical infrastructures, they are shaped by social, political, and economic issues, revealing an unpredictable and multifaceted development.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
🌟 contribution 2 I argue that BTC and ETH are a new form of currencies! Their uniqueness lies in a polycentric governance establishing a distributed consensus logic, different from the contractual logic of signature or the fiduciary logic of seal characteristic of private and public currencies
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaresAestheth pfp
RaresAestheth
@raresaesth.eth
🌟 Contributions 3: Using a sociology of crises, I analyze the polycentric governance of CC, revealing two types of crises (vulnerability & evolution) and two forms of governance (closed doors & public). Beyond their code, CC ultimately rely on social consensus.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction