Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/daos
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rafa
@rafa
Currently, we’re on the path of protocolizing digital governance. Yet it seems to be converging on esoteric jargon and functions, is there a path out? Is there something else that won’t lead us to localized ossification with niche standards, procedures, and a working class of governance technical support?
4 replies
2 recasts
27 reactions
1𝐴35𝐸1
@1a35e1
Its fine IMO, In time best practices will come out in the wash. Over simplification, is just dumbing things down which would lead to a dominate two-party system we see IRL which defeats the whole point of governance innovation. Ultimate goal here is to show people they can have an effect on outcomes.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Trigs
@trigs.eth
I feel like we're still experimenting with primitives and speed running the entire history of human governance onchain. So I see the jargon as part of the process as us nerds really nail down the inner workings before actual communities can abstract away the language. For example, look at bean.money and how they use abstract language for defi. It's cool and clever and makes a great narrative, but it's also even more difficult to fully grok what is going on behind the scenes because defi is so nascent still. Hasn't helped them gain adoption for a concept that hasn't caught on yet: credit based collateral. I'm short: I think once we start to see governance that works in niche communities, we will start to see projects build abstraction that makes it more accessible and we'll see the jargon fade out of the common vernacular.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
krel
@krel
whats the worst jargon? im too deep to realize probs
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
na
@na
if you're talking about ribbonfarm's new letter than i think it probably depends on nature, whether we find a patch of simplicity in the otherwise weirder and weirder math of it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Solgeking🎩🐹
@solgeking
Imo DAO models only work when work of the core specialist team voted for by the masses are not subjected to whims and fancies of people who change their minds E.g. Core specialists (leaders, main coders, etc) focus on their output work DAOs then fulfill the political aspect? Of voting for various matters which aim to improve output Seems to be an easy thing but on paper difficult to execute. Best seen e.g. from perhaps Jup governance, worst ones - most failing defi protocols
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
TipsterBot
@tipster
You've received 100 $daos! "thinking ahead" - from @trigs.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
