@purges478
ETH needs its own Michael Saylor
With all due respect to @sassal.eth and others who hold this view: I don’t think it does.
The only reason BTC maxis love Saylor is because he holds the promise of pumping their bags.
It’s a Faustian growth hack, though. If BTC moons, Saylor becomes its natural figurehead and spokesperson. If BTC dumps hard, $MSTR becomes a single point of cascading failure. Either outcome is terrible.
It would be much more antifragile for BTC to achieve the same scarcity by being near-evenly spread across a large population.
As for ETH, there’s only enough supply for every human on this planet to own 0.015 of it (~$50). Imagine a world with far fewer whales and much more krill — true abundance.
To repeat: we don’t need a Saylor. Instead, we need to organically put ETH into as many hands as possible, which itself requires that we keep increasing its utility
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction