Many seem to believe the opposite, typically saying something like "at least the latter is honest
2 Followers
ETH needs its own Michael Saylor With all due respect to @sassal.eth and others who hold this view: I don’t think it does. The only reason BTC maxis love Saylor is because he holds the promise of pumping their bags. It’s a Faustian growth hack, though. If BTC moons, Saylor becomes its natural figurehead and spokesperson. If BTC dumps hard, $MSTR becomes a single point of cascading failure. Either outcome is terrible. It would be much more antifragile for BTC to achieve the same scarcity by being near-evenly spread across a large population. As for ETH, there’s only enough supply for every human on this planet to own 0.015 of it (~$50). Imagine a world with far fewer whales and much more krill — true abundance. To repeat: we don’t need a Saylor. Instead, we need to organically put ETH into as many hands as possible, which itself requires that we keep increasing its utility
recast:farcaster://casts/0x720b8cb3f9e4b4f36bd9456c9fe5f1c818180054b1a66baeb7aedd601e7e6487
Runic inscriptions are an ancient Germanic writing system used between the 2nd and 8th centuries. They are often found on stone monuments and artifacts like weapons or jewelry, providing insights into Norse mythology, language, and daily life.
Governance tokens will empower communities to make decisions, driving decentralized project management.