Lost ballot
@humanityprot 
On a January 2020 day, the atmosphere in the National Assembly chamber was tense as MPs considered the annual budget bill, a crucial law that would determine the future of the country. Mr. Somchai, an MP from a province, rushed through the crowd to enter the chamber in time. He had to vote on an important issue, but when it was time to insert his electronic card to verify his identity, he found that his card was missing from his bag.

A Human-Centric Blockchain. 

Testnet live https://testnet.humanity.org 
Referrer code "T"

TG https://t.me/HumanityProt
👾 https://Discord.gg/HumanityProt

🌊👉  
.basepunk
.base.eth
Base Voyage

The impact was more severe than Somchai expected. The draft budget bill was questioned about its legality, the budget allocation process was delayed, many local development projects were halted, villagers in Somchai’s province were angry because the construction of a community hospital waiting for a budget had to be postponed. Somchai himself was called in for questioning by the NACC, and the reputation he had built for years was destroyed overnight.

A World Changed by Humanity Protocol

Imagine a world where the parliament used Humanity Protocol technology, a palm-scanning identity verification system, instead of using electronic cards. On that same day, Somchai did not have to worry about losing his ballot because when it was time to vote, he simply placed his palm on the scanner installed in the meeting room. The Humanity Protocol system used his palm print, a unique biometric data for each individual, to verify his identity immediately.

The system works by matching the palm print to a securely encrypted database that cannot be forged or transferred to others. Somchai’s fellow MPs did not have the opportunity to insert his ballot instead because there was no ballot to take from the beginning. Therefore, every vote was transparent and in accordance with the intentions of each MP.

In this world, the media did not have the opportunity to capture images of people inserting their ballots instead of each other. Because everyone must verify their identity with their own palm, the people are confident that the bills passed by the House will reflect the true intentions of the people's representatives, that development projects can proceed smoothly, and that Somchai will not face any accusations or damage to his reputation.

“Where is my card?” Somchai frantically searched his bag but could not find it. He thought back to the morning when he had lent his card to a fellow MP to help him “vote on his behalf” while he had to go to a meeting outside the office. Somchai thought it was a minor matter because in the parliament, there were usually some MPs who helped insert their cards to ensure that the target number of votes was met.

However, this incident became a turning point when the media captured footage of an MP holding several cards and quickly inserting them into the voting machine. The footage was broadcast on television and social media, and became a hot topic that shook the public’s confidence in the legislative system. Ordinary people began to question, “If MPs can insert cards on behalf of others, How can the law be legitimate?”