Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/walletbeat
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
๐Ÿ“จ New wallet attribute: ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ You wouldn't publish your bank statements online for all to see. Yet crypto payments today reveal just as much. Walletbeat now checks if wallets integrate privacy tech for token transfers by default. Raising the bar.
4 replies
7 recasts
35 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
The only wallets that implement such tech today call themselves "privacy wallets". But as @vitalik.eth states, you shouldn't have to download a "privacy wallet" to get privacy. Privacy is a human right. Privacy is normal. Privacy should be the default everywhere.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
"Privacy wallets" are not a thing. They are just wallets. It is the other wallets that are "non-private wallets". Would you walk around with one of these?
1 reply
3 recasts
5 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
The lack of onchain privacy has hampered mainstream adoption, as it's below even web2 levels. It is also a physical safety issue. If paying a merchant reveals your balance to them while you're in their store, you're exposing yourself to the perfect setup to get wrench-attacked.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Walletbeat therefore checks not just that you can transfer tokens privately, but that ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—น๐˜. As it is for non-crypto payments. And as it ought to be.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Walletbeat currently only looks at ERC-5564 stealth address support. Future iterations will consider other privacy tech, but here's how the ERC-5564 checks work:
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Walletbeat checks if you can privately ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ, ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ, and ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ private balances. For sending, it checks that no one learns who you are or who you are sending to.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Balance lookups are quite difficult to implement in a truly privacy-preserving way for stealth addresses due to metadata privacy. If you look up all your stealth addresses' balance at once, you may not have published an onchain link between them, but your RPC provider knows it.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Walletbeat also checks that you can safely separate your stealth addresses into separate pools that never mix funds with one another. Otherwise, you could accidentally create links between your stealth addresses if spending from more than one of them at a time.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Future iterations will consider other privacy tech such as @railgun, @0xbowio, @aztecnetwork, and more. The goal is to be very inclusive here. Onchain privacy has a long way to go, so tent should be wide. Same principle: Privately ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ, ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ, and ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
"Why only token transfers? Why not privacy for other types of transactions?" Small steps. Privacy for plain crypto payments is a clear baseline, and it should be uncontroversially obvious that this level of privacy is necessary. Once ubiquitous, other transaction types will follow.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
This attribute and all others are now visible at https://beta.walletbeat.eth.limo Yes, it's red everywhere. None of the wallets currently tracked implement private token transfers. Interested in helping? Join /walletbeat ๐Ÿซก Credits to @elistonberg for image generation!
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

MetaEnd๐ŸŽฉ pfp
MetaEnd๐ŸŽฉ
@metaend.eth
Missing /fluidkey @moritz
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions