Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/walletbeat
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Prior to launch, /walletbeat is looking for decentralized hosting solutions for its frontend. I am in the process of writing up requirements and describing how they map to the available technology choices. In the meantime, some thoughts on why decentralized hosting matters for /walletbeat below. ๐Ÿงต
5 replies
0 recast
13 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Decentralized hosting, relative to traditional web hosting, usually comes with higher resilience, censorship resistance, and integrity verifiability. But why would Walletbeat need that? After all, walletbeat isn't security-critical. It doesn't require a wallet to be connected. It doesn't even store user data. It's a purely informational site. There is an argument that a site like Walletbeat shouldn't bother with decentralized hosting, because it doesn't have the resilience or security needs. That is certainly what a web2 startup would conclude. Walletbeat is not that. Walletbeat's fundamental goal is to push the Ethereum ecosystem forward. Part of that ethos requires a commitment to crypto values, which decentralized hosting embodies. Today, most Ethereum applications rely on web2 infrastructure and traditional hosting solutions to survive. This has infamously cost the industry over a billion dollars: https://blog.ipfs.tech/2025-could-ipfs-prevent-bybit-hack/
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Clearly there is need to make progress on the adoption of decentralized hosting solutions within the crypto industry. That sounds a lot like Walletbeat's mission statement, only about web hosting rather than wallets. The ethos behind this sentiment is the same. If Walletbeat โ€” an entity with a commitment to crypto values and with the goal to push these values out to others โ€” doesn't bother with this, ๐˜„๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜† ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ผ? So while Walletbeat itself doesn't strictly need the properties provided by decentralized hosting solution on a technical aspect, relying on traditional hosting would send a clear message of hypocrisy and lack of commitment to crypto values. This message would weaken Walletbeat's actual message to the wallet ecosystem. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ธ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ธ.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions