FarCon

ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster.

the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level.

clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol.

all roads lead to winner take all.

what’s the point?

This is the inherent schizophrenia of crypto. 

A Delaware C-corp raises equity capital to build a user-facing app, while building an underlying protocol destined to one day welcome as many competitors as possible, and whose token will capture most of the liquid value.

Somehow the team must navigate the contradiction.

Founders

@dwr.eth how do you plan to address diverging incentives between the venture funded Warpcast client team and the Farcaster protocol development team (w a current large overlap)

Warpcast employees benefit from equity, but Farcaster protocol devs don’t have a native token

Have you written on this tension before?