Peter Kim
@peter
I’m not anon, but I’m pretty sure people were upset about how the token launch was communicated (vague, then another token launched right after similar to Trump -> Melania liquidity fracture) rather than the chart going down which happens all the time trading Big official accounts shilling something have a lot of weight in the trenches I’m not saying it’s right of people to think that way, but that’s just reality on CT. When people get upset and lose money they will get angry and post all sorts of crazy shit especially if it could’ve been somewhat prevented will be hard to rewire their way of thinking FYI, I missed the token entirely and never traded it so trying to give an honest objective opinion of someone that both trades actively and is building in the space
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
Peter Kim
@peter
If base official account had posted the Zora coin and stated also this was in no way an official token for the base network it probably would’ve capped out around 300-500k cap and this would’ve been a whole nothingburger imho
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> rather than the chart going down which happens all the time trading if the chart had gone to $1B market cap, no one would have complained
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
borodutch
@farcasteradmin.eth
> rather than the chart going down nope, this was the main and the only complaint in the end, and i've listened to many x spaces on the topic yesterday people were upset that they lost money
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
